Record alias tree decision and private refactoring analysis
This commit is contained in:
@@ -245,10 +245,17 @@ The source declarations contain only Θ(RD) tokens.
|
||||
Traverse distinct source prefixes once and classify each once. For the audited
|
||||
shape, this phase can become O(RD + D²).
|
||||
|
||||
**Decision:** design F14 and F15 together around shared source-prefix processing,
|
||||
preferably reusing the existing alias source structure rather than adding parallel
|
||||
indexes. The repeated preparation and help-time scan remain distinct findings.
|
||||
The performance-testing decision under F13 applies to both.
|
||||
**Decision:** implement F14 and F15 together using the existing alias resolver's
|
||||
source-path tree. Add narrow internal read-only operations to enumerate distinct
|
||||
nonempty proper prefixes for F14 and find strictly descendant alias sources for
|
||||
F15. Retain the existing discovery classification and exclusions, applying them
|
||||
once per candidate prefix.
|
||||
|
||||
Reuse the tree's routing-snapshot lifetime; do not introduce a parallel index or
|
||||
a cross-invocation result cache. The repeated preparation and help-time scan
|
||||
remain distinct findings. The [joint analysis](remediation-analysis.md#f14f15--joint-source-prefix-design)
|
||||
records the accepted design. The performance-testing decision under F13 applies
|
||||
to both; implementation remains pending.
|
||||
|
||||
**Original:** [02-efficiency E3](02-efficiency.md#e3--p3-discovery-context-preparation-rebuilds-shared-prefixes-repeatedly).
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -259,8 +266,14 @@ examinations and repeated copies even when there are no descendants. A valid
|
||||
single-token alias chain produces Θ(A²) work to discover an empty alias section
|
||||
on every such help request.
|
||||
|
||||
Query an immutable source-prefix index for strict descendants. The identified
|
||||
discovery work becomes O(A) for that example; general cases still pay for
|
||||
**Decision:** query the existing resolver tree for strict descendants through
|
||||
the internal operation shared with F14's design. Continue visiting intermediate
|
||||
resolution paths, resolving composed entered paths through the existing
|
||||
resolver, and retaining canonical-target checks, suffix deduplication, and
|
||||
output sorting. Root help may retain the complete catalog when all entries are
|
||||
needed. No public API or CLI behavior change is selected.
|
||||
|
||||
The identified discovery work becomes O(A) for that example; general cases still pay for
|
||||
matching candidates, resolution, and output sorting. Design this together with
|
||||
F14 under the decisions recorded there and in F13.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user